fact check Policy

FY2026 —Innovative Reforms or Missed Opportunities?

While pragmatic in crisis management, the budget lacks the vision to redefine Bangladesh’s economic future.

Written by Mrinal Haque


Dhaka, June 6, 2025 – Bangladesh’s Tk 7.9 lakh crore ($72 billion) FY2026 national budget, presented by Finance Adviser Salehuddin Ahmed on June 2, has sparked intense debate over its innovative credentials. Unveiled by an unelected interim government amid persistent inflation (9.05% in May 2025) and political transition, the budget claims to prioritize “macroeconomic stability” and “equitable growth.” But does it deliver genuine innovation? The Banking Post fact-checks key claims .


🔍 Claim 1: “Historic Fiscal Discipline”

Verdict: ✅ Partially Innovative

  • Contractionary Size: At 0.88% smaller than FY2025, this marks Bangladesh’s first budget reduction since independence. The deficit target (3.62% of GDP) is the lowest in a decade, signaling aggressive fiscal consolidation .
  • ADP Cuts: The Annual Development Programme (ADP) allocation drops 13.2% to Tk 2.3 lakh crore, focusing on “high-impact projects.” Critics argue this undermines human capital, with health (-Tk 2,535 crore) and education (-Tk 2,971 crore) facing cuts .
  • Financing Shift: Plans to borrow Tk 1.35 trillion abroad (vs. Tk 1.25 trillion domestically) aim to ease banking-sector pressure—a structural improvement .

📊 Claim 2: “Progressive Revenue Mobilization”

Verdict: ❌ Not Innovative

  • Unrealistic Targets: Revenue collection aims for Tk 5.64 lakh crore (+8.88% YoY), but historical underperformance (20% deficit in FY2025) and IMF pressure for Tk 5.8 lakh crore expose credibility gaps .
  • Regressive Reliance: Indirect taxes (VAT, duties) remain 63% of NBR revenue, disproportionately burdening low-income households. No wealth tax or corporate rate hikes were introduced .
  • NBR Restructuring Stalled: A plan to split the tax agency into two divisions—potentially innovative—is paralyzed by staff protests .

🌱 Claim 3: “Sectoral Transformation”

Verdict: ⚠️ Mixed Innovation

Agriculture

  • Partial Modernization: Reduced advance income tax (AIT) on agro-processing inputs and duty-free cold storage machinery could cut post-harvest losses. However, ADP allocation fell 14%, and climate-resilient seeds receive no funding .
  • Energy Blind Spot: VAT exemption on LNG imports lacks guarantees for fertilizer production gas—a critical gap as 60% of coastal farmland faces salinity .

Textiles & Exports

  • RMG Status Quo: Corporate tax unchanged for manufacturers, but no new support to counter US tariffs. The jute/textile ministry gets Tk 4.8 billion (-3.6% YoY) .
  • Tech Boost: Software development tools’ import duty cut to 5%—a nod to export diversification .

🌍 Claim 4: “Climate Resilience Pioneer”

Verdict: ❌ Severely Lacking

  • Inadequate Funding: Climate allocation stagnates at 0.75% of GDP ($3.6B), far below the 3% ($18.24B) needed annually to implement adaptation plans .
  • Coastal Neglect: No new funding for salinity-resistant crops or embankments, despite 39 million coastal residents facing cyclones and displacement .
  • Debt Trap: 75% of climate finance comes as loans, increasing fiscal vulnerability .

⚖️ Claim 5: “Social Equity Focus”

Verdict: ❌ Regressive

  • Safety Net Streamlining: Programmes reduced from 140 to 95, but coverage remains thin. No minimum wage for informal workers or land reforms for tenant farmers (40% of agricultural households) .
  • Black Money Amnesty: Continuation of wealth whitening schemes—widely condemned as corruption enablers .
  • Gender Tokenism: Widow allowances increased but no care-work protections or land rights for women .

💡 Innovation Scorecard: Hits vs. Misses

Policy AreaInnovative ElementStatus
Fiscal ConsolidationSmallest deficit in a decade (3.62% GDP)✅ Implemented
Tax AdministrationNBR restructuring proposal🚧 Stalled
AgricultureDuty-free cold storage machinery✅ Implemented
Climate FinancingOwn-resource mobilization roadmap❌ Absent
Wealth TaxationProgressive direct tax reforms❌ Rejected

🗣️ Expert Reactions

“Innovation requires courage. This budget stabilizes—not transforms.”
Dr. Fahmida Khatun, CPD

“Reducing ADP for health/education during a demographic boom is anti-innovation. Human capital is Bangladesh’s only real resource.”
Nahid Islam, National Citizen Party

“Duty rationalization for 722 goods aids competitiveness post-LDC graduation. But without export diversification, it’s a half-measure.”
Lightcastle Partners


📌 The Bottom Line

Bangladesh’s FY2026 budget introduces niche administrative innovations (deficit control, ADP streamlining) but fails systemic reform. Critical gaps remain:

  1. Revenue Justice: No wealth tax expansion; reliance on regressive indirect taxes .
  2. Climate Ambition: Allocation <1% of GDP ignores $534B needed by 2050 .
  3. Human Capital: Education/health cuts contradict “equitable growth” rhetoric .

While pragmatic in crisis management, the budget lacks the vision to redefine Bangladesh’s economic future. As the National Citizen Party notes: “No revolution endures without redistribution” .


Sources: Bangladesh Ministry of Finance, CPD, Lightcastle Partners, The Daily Star, The Business Standard, IMF Conditions (Data current as of June 2025).


About the author