---

Dr Nasrin Sheely

Bangladesh Bank’s circular dated November 3, 2025, introducing a foreign currency–Taka swap facility for exporters, marks a significant step in the country’s gradual embrace of market-based liquidity management tools. The facility allows exporters to obtain short-term Taka liquidity by swapping foreign currency holdings from their 30-day pools and Exporters’ Retention Quota (ERQ) accounts with banks, while retaining their foreign currency exposure through a simultaneous forward transaction. This is not only a liquidity support mechanism but also a structural innovation that positions Bangladesh closer to the mainstream use of derivatives in financial intermediation.

In the past few years, exporters have repeatedly faced liquidity mismatches between export realization and local operational expenses. Although foreign exchange inflows through export earnings have been robust, the process of conversion into local currency from ERQ accounts often led to premature encashment, resulting in exchange losses when Taka later depreciated. The new arrangement allows exporters to meet their immediate working capital needs without surrendering their foreign currency at an unfavorable moment. It strikes a balance between maintaining foreign currency exposure and ensuring liquidity, which is particularly valuable in times of exchange rate volatility.

At the core of this facility is a simple yet powerful idea: using a swap contract as a liquidity bridge. An exporter with idle balances in ERQ or 30-day pools can enter into a swap with an Authorized Dealer (AD) bank, selling foreign currency spot against Taka, and agreeing to repurchase the same foreign currency after a certain period—usually up to 30 days. The pricing of the swap is determined by the differential between the Taka and foreign currency interest rates, ensuring that the transaction remains market-reflective rather than administratively fixed.

This arrangement benefits all parties involved. Exporters get immediate access to Taka liquidity for their operational needs. Banks gain short-term foreign currency assets that can help manage their own position limits and funding requirements. Moreover, since the transaction is not categorized as a loan, it does not increase credit exposure or require capital provisioning, making it a clean, market-neutral liquidity tool.

The introduction of such swaps also sends a positive signal to international investors and multilateral institutions. It demonstrates Bangladesh’s readiness to adopt derivative-based risk management practices, aligning its financial system more closely with global norms. For a country aiming to transition toward greater financial openness—especially after its impending LDC graduation—this development represents both technical and philosophical progress. The financial system is moving from one that relies on direct control to one that empowers market participants with tools to hedge, manage, and optimize financial risks.

However, the introduction of the foreign currency–Taka swap should not be seen as an endpoint. Rather, it should be viewed as a starting point for building a deeper and more diversified derivatives market in Bangladesh. Around the world, derivatives have become essential instruments for managing interest rate, exchange rate, and credit risks. The absence of such tools often forces firms to operate with higher uncertainty and higher costs of capital. Bangladesh’s economy, increasingly integrated with global trade and finance, can no longer rely solely on traditional banking products such as loans, letters of credit, and forward contracts. A modern financial system requires a suite of derivatives that allows exporters, importers, and investors to manage volatility effectively.

The next logical step after foreign currency–Taka swaps is to broaden the range of permissible derivative instruments under the regulatory framework. Bangladesh Bank could consider allowing forward rate agreements (FRAs) and interest rate swaps (IRS), cross currency swaps. IRS would enable corporates to hedge against future interest rate movements—a need that is becoming more critical as the country moves toward market-based interest rate determination.

Another area where derivative development could bring significant benefits is commodity-linked hedging. Given Bangladesh’s heavy reliance on imported commodities—such as petroleum, edible oil, and fertilizers—local banks could develop structured derivative products in collaboration with global counterparties to help importers lock in future prices. This would reduce the fiscal and corporate vulnerability to sudden global commodity price shocks, which have often translated into inflationary pressures and balance of payment strains.

Similarly, exporters with long-term contracts could benefit from currency forwards and options beyond the short 30-day or 90-day tenors currently available. By allowing longer-dated forward contracts or even vanilla currency options, Bangladesh Bank could enable firms to manage currency risk in a more sophisticated and cost-effective manner. The use of such tools would also reduce the reliance on ad-hoc central bank measures to stabilize the exchange rate, allowing market-based risk management to play a stronger role.

For sustainablity of derivative products, it is essential for the establishment of a robust legal and accounting framework. Bangladesh’s Financial Reporting Standards and local banking laws need to explicitly recognize derivatives as legitimate financial instruments with clear enforceability. The lack of legal clarity often discourages both banks and corporates from engaging in such transactions, fearing regulatory ambiguity. By defining derivatives as risk management tools—distinct from speculative instruments—the regulator can foster confidence and encourage responsible participation.

In practical terms, the new swap facility for exporters can be viewed as a small but meaningful pilot project for such broader market evolution. It allows both banks and exporters to gain operational experience with derivative-style transactions under a controlled framework. The lessons learned from pricing, documentation, and settlement of these swaps can feed directly into future regulatory refinements for other instruments.

There is also potential for the new facility to complement other financial products such as FX swaps among banks, cross-currency swaps, and foreign exchange forwards. Banks could use interbank swaps to balance their liquidity positions more efficiently, reducing their dependency on the central bank for short-term funding. Over time, a functioning interbank swap market could emerge as a key component of Bangladesh’s money market architecture.

The macroeconomic benefits of a developed derivative market are not limited to liquidity management. They extend to financial stability, investment promotion, and integration into global value chains. Investors—both domestic and foreign—prefer environments where financial risks can be quantified and hedged. By expanding derivative offerings, Bangladesh can make its capital markets more attractive to foreign investors who require hedging instruments to manage exposure. In turn, this can bring in new forms of capital, including portfolio investment, long-term infrastructure financing, and trade-related funding.

In a broader sense, this move also reflects a gradual shift in policy thinking—from administrative control to market facilitation. For decades, Bangladesh’s financial policies were guided by direct regulation of exchange rates, interest rates, and capital flows. While this ensured stability in earlier stages of development, it also limited innovation and responsiveness. The introduction of derivatives like currency swaps, forward contracts, and eventually options and interest rate products indicates a willingness to trust market mechanisms within a prudentially supervised framework.

The November 3 circular is thus more than a liquidity management instruction—it represents a vision for modernizing the financial system. It acknowledges that in an increasingly globalized environment, managing financial risks requires more than credit and deposits; it requires instruments that allow participants to hedge, diversify, and plan.

For exporters, this facility is timely, as it allows them to manage cash flow mismatches without resorting to additional borrowing. For the financial system, it is transformative, as it opens the door to broader derivative-based innovation.

If this initiative succeeds, it should inspire further regulatory steps—such as enabling longer-tenor swaps, expanding into interbank FX derivatives, and eventually building an organized derivatives exchange for standardized contracts. These developments, pursued prudently, would deepen Bangladesh’s financial markets, enhance resilience, and support sustainable growth.

In essence, Bangladesh’s new foreign currency–Taka swap facility is a modest yet meaningful beginning of a long-awaited transformation. It provides a practical, risk-managed solution to exporters’ liquidity needs while signaling a strategic evolution toward a derivatives-enabled economy. The challenge ahead lies in maintaining the balance—encouraging innovation while safeguarding stability. If that balance is achieved, Bangladesh’s financial system could finally enter a new era of maturity, flexibility, and global competitiveness.